<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Reasons Why You Should Switch to Flock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/</link>
	<description>Solving Everyday Problems With Simple Technology - Freeware, Productivity, Useful Tips &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:01:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-225773</link>
		<dc:creator>Web3.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-225773</guid>
		<description>BTW, The really interesting thing is that this new browser will hurt Firefox far more than it will IE.  Very much like the Mac hurts LINUX more than it does Microsoft.  (Remember, Microsoft makes a significant amount of money from software sales on the Mac.)

I have to question your stats for browser marketshare.  Most I&#039;ve seen put the share of Firefox much lower and leveling off.  

And within the firewalls of corporate computing, IE reigns supreme.  

But, as I pointed out above, the browser is going to stop being an application platform and return to its proper use of being a browser.  

And there will be much rejoicing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, The really interesting thing is that this new browser will hurt Firefox far more than it will IE.  Very much like the Mac hurts LINUX more than it does Microsoft.  (Remember, Microsoft makes a significant amount of money from software sales on the Mac.)</p>
<p>I have to question your stats for browser marketshare.  Most I&#8217;ve seen put the share of Firefox much lower and leveling off.  </p>
<p>And within the firewalls of corporate computing, IE reigns supreme.  </p>
<p>But, as I pointed out above, the browser is going to stop being an application platform and return to its proper use of being a browser.  </p>
<p>And there will be much rejoicing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-225760</link>
		<dc:creator>Web3.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-225760</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it about time for the Internet based applications to leave th confines of a web browser?

There is a better way.  The servers can host virtual applications that are accessed not by a web browser, but by a remote client (akin to remote desktop.)  This gives a true fat client that is running on the server.  The server has much greater control over the environment in which the application is running.  This yields better user experiences, better security, better reliability, better performance for many.  Pretty much better everything.

But best of all, no crappy web browsers.

And you can still do all your SaaS, SOA, and the like.  You just don&#039;t have to deploy applications in HTML and use kludges like AJAX to make a web app look like a real application.

The best of the web and the client.  No compromises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it about time for the Internet based applications to leave th confines of a web browser?</p>
<p>There is a better way.  The servers can host virtual applications that are accessed not by a web browser, but by a remote client (akin to remote desktop.)  This gives a true fat client that is running on the server.  The server has much greater control over the environment in which the application is running.  This yields better user experiences, better security, better reliability, better performance for many.  Pretty much better everything.</p>
<p>But best of all, no crappy web browsers.</p>
<p>And you can still do all your SaaS, SOA, and the like.  You just don&#8217;t have to deploy applications in HTML and use kludges like AJAX to make a web app look like a real application.</p>
<p>The best of the web and the client.  No compromises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITrush</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-220931</link>
		<dc:creator>ITrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-220931</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting, haven&#039;t tested it yet, thanks for sharing.

nhick
http://www.itrush.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, haven&#8217;t tested it yet, thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>nhick<br />
<a href="http://www.itrush.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.itrush.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nirmal</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-220929</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirmal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-220929</guid>
		<description>Superb article, I too had written a similar post on this 6 months back. Flock is a great browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb article, I too had written a similar post on this 6 months back. Flock is a great browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-218742</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-218742</guid>
		<description>I tried flock about a year ago and went right back to firefox...I gave it another shot after reading your post....OMG it is great and just what I needed...I feel so bad because I have been such a loyal firefox fan and user....I really feel guilty...but I am staying with flock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried flock about a year ago and went right back to firefox&#8230;I gave it another shot after reading your post&#8230;.OMG it is great and just what I needed&#8230;I feel so bad because I have been such a loyal firefox fan and user&#8230;.I really feel guilty&#8230;but I am staying with flock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKA Riptide Furse &#187; My del.icio.us bookmarks for January 31st through March 26th</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-218710</link>
		<dc:creator>AKA Riptide Furse &#187; My del.icio.us bookmarks for January 31st through March 26th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-218710</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 5 Reasons Why You Should Switch to Flock - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 5 Reasons Why You Should Switch to Flock &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Yeang</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-217480</link>
		<dc:creator>James Yeang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-217480</guid>
		<description>Edrei: I don&#039;t really feel its bloated, perhaps it depends on system specs.  
@A.Faith: Yeah - the new version is awesome tho
@keeyit: Switch :) 
@red: You need a widescreen monitor to fully appreciate the sidebars.  On a normal monitor it clutters up the screen.
@vickie: Great!
@kucau &amp; Technolaziness: Syahid&#039;s right... didn&#039;t see much of a dip in performance moving from Firefox to Flock.
@Syahid: Agree - Opera is the more robust browser - but Flock is just so much sexier :)
@Chris: Thanks for posting the list up on listdid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edrei: I don&#8217;t really feel its bloated, perhaps it depends on system specs.<br />
@A.Faith: Yeah &#8211; the new version is awesome tho<br />
@keeyit: Switch :)<br />
@red: You need a widescreen monitor to fully appreciate the sidebars.  On a normal monitor it clutters up the screen.<br />
@vickie: Great!<br />
@kucau &#038; Technolaziness: Syahid&#8217;s right&#8230; didn&#8217;t see much of a dip in performance moving from Firefox to Flock.<br />
@Syahid: Agree &#8211; Opera is the more robust browser &#8211; but Flock is just so much sexier :)<br />
@Chris: Thanks for posting the list up on listdid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-217134</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-217134</guid>
		<description>Another great list... I posted it on http://listdid.com

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great list&#8230; I posted it on <a href="http://listdid.com" rel="nofollow">http://listdid.com</a></p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-217057</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-217057</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried to switch to Flock once, but updates come to late and I&#039;ve faced a few problems with it! Even so, it really impressed me, even if in my native language the name of this programs sounds like pubic hair :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried to switch to Flock once, but updates come to late and I&#8217;ve faced a few problems with it! Even so, it really impressed me, even if in my native language the name of this programs sounds like pubic hair :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keeyit</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-216804</link>
		<dc:creator>keeyit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-216804</guid>
		<description>I still using IE.. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still using IE.. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syahid A.</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-216642</link>
		<dc:creator>Syahid A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-216642</guid>
		<description>Imo, either Flock or Firefox use nearly the same amount of memory (big, of course). Opera performs slightly better but will suffer too once a lot of tabs had been opened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imo, either Flock or Firefox use nearly the same amount of memory (big, of course). Opera performs slightly better but will suffer too once a lot of tabs had been opened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vickie</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-216593</link>
		<dc:creator>vickie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-216593</guid>
		<description>ok I will give it a try :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok I will give it a try :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-215752</link>
		<dc:creator>red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-215752</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post, James.

I gave it a try long time ago and I gave up on it. After reading your top 5 reasons I was intrigued by your reason no. 1. So now I&#039;m typing this comment in Flock 1.1. 

Those integrations could be very handy, but somehow the sidebar style just don&#039;t capture my heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, James.</p>
<p>I gave it a try long time ago and I gave up on it. After reading your top 5 reasons I was intrigued by your reason no. 1. So now I&#8217;m typing this comment in Flock 1.1. </p>
<p>Those integrations could be very handy, but somehow the sidebar style just don&#8217;t capture my heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnoLaziness</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-215737</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnoLaziness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-215737</guid>
		<description>James, I am a bit concerned about flock&#039;s memory usage. With rich features, it is obviously gonna bloat my system. But nevertheless I am going to give it a try for its tempting feature set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I am a bit concerned about flock&#8217;s memory usage. With rich features, it is obviously gonna bloat my system. But nevertheless I am going to give it a try for its tempting feature set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kucau</title>
		<link>http://www.friedbeef.com/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-215256</link>
		<dc:creator>kucau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friedbeef.com/2008/03/22/top-5-reasons-why-you-should-switch-to-flock/#comment-215256</guid>
		<description>ermm, i think flock does not have &quot;memory leak&quot;  problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ermm, i think flock does not have &#8220;memory leak&#8221;  problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
